Public and private health care: cts and logic needed?

Public and private health care: cts and logic needed?,Mr. Finnerty asked each of them to answer a , direct and highly relevant question, namely, If elected, would you act to shut down all private medical services in Quebec? Each of the three, following the mantra clearly ordered by their respective leaders, said exactly the same thing: Yes, if such services violated the Canada Health Act.

Sixth, there is no reason whatsoever why a public system, accessible to all those who wish to use it, should not coexist with private health-care services. In ct, since those using private services would continue to pay their taxes, the public system would be better-financed than it is today, as pressure on it would recede.

First, however much those responsible seek to deny it, we already have a two-tier system and, probably, several other tiers as well.

Sony Corp. could ce legal action across the globe after it belatedly disclosed one of the biggest online data breaches ever.

Fifth, the approPublic and private health care: cts and logic needed?priate solution, perhaps following a royal commission, as historian Michael Bliss has suggested, is an open and transparent mixed system, such as has been adopted over the years throughout Europe.

Eighth, to the extent that some citizens choose to use and pay for private healthcare services, in addition to having their taxes pay for the public system, resources would be freed up to serve patients in the public system. All would be better served and there would be less need for the type of dramatic headline that The Gazette printed last week.

There is little doubt that some doctors would prefer to work exclusively in the public system, for any number of reasons. All others should be required to spend at least a significant portion of their time in the public system. Furthermore, there is no reason why the total number of doctors, nurses and other providers could not be increased.

Fourth, nobody ever has suggested or will suggest, as the health terrorists would have us believe, that we move to an American health-care system, that one being even more dysfunctional than our own. Our basic public system must be preserved.

Seventh, those who raise alarmist fears about doctors and other health-care providers fleeing the public for the private system are beating a straw man. Provincialgovernment control would continue to exist over all health-care providers and, to the extent necessary, such governments could regulate all services within the two systems.

Third, in its present form, the Canadian health-care system is not sustainable in the long term, either financially or in terms of resources.

One morning last week, after I had read the Gazette headline Hip surgery wait times il seniors, I heard Mike Finnerty on CBC Daybreak interviewing three candidates. For the sake of their mily and friends, I will not name them!

Second, if an attempt were made by a Canadian government to shut down all private health-care services, the entire health-care system would very quickly collapse. Of course, the threat is merely the most blatant hypocrisy, since the existence of private services is wellknown to all.

All parties are displaying the most blatant intellectual dishonesty on health-care issues. To borrow from Aneurin Bevan, speaking of Anthony Edprivate healthen during the Suez crisis, If he is sincere in what he is saying then he is too stupid to be a Prime Minister. It is perhaps more a matter of integrity than stupidity. There are a few cts that any moderately intelligent and intellectually honest person knows about the health-care system.

Leave a Reply